This is a final draft of our Federal Civil Rights Violation Law Suit.
Guy Neighbors Law Suit Against the Lwerance Kansas Police Department and The City of Lawrence Kansas (Amedd... by
Guy Madison Neighbors
. Statement of
Entitlement
The defendant’s
violated Neighbors, rights guaranteed by the constitution at 18 U.S.C.S. 1983.
The defendant’s racially profiled Neighbors, during several traffic stops that
were performed without probable cause. The defendant’s acted with “Deliberate
Indifference” to following the “Constitution” or “Federal Laws” when they
performed the traffic stops on Neighbors, without probable cause. These
un-lawful traffic stops were the result of the Un- Constitutional Policies,
Procedures, Ordinances, and Laws the City of Lawrence implemented.
The defendant’s acted
with deliberate indifference to following the constitution, and federal laws.
Neighbors was damaged while the defendants were enforcing city policies while
acting “under color of law,” and the unconstitutional policies, procedures,
ordinances, City Laws are the source of this action.
Courts Citation
Process is Un-Constitutional:
Separation of powers is a political doctrine originating
in the writings of Montesquieu in The Spirit of the Laws where
he urged for a constitutional government with three separate branches of
government. Each of the three branches would have defined abilities to check
the powers of the other branches. This idea was called separation of powers.
This philosophy heavily influenced the writing of the United States
Constitution, according to which the Legislative Executive and Judicial branches of the
United States government are kept distinct
in order to prevent abuse of power.
When Lawrence Kansas
Police officer issued Neighbors, a “Summons” that was NOT signed by a “Judicial
officer” of the court,( prior to the ticket being issued), it is a violation of
the “Separation of Powers” clause the of the Constitution, and therefore the
defendant’s violated Neighbors, Constitutional Rights for each of the 3 citations.
Neighbors suffered damages.
Our legal system and
statutes are filled with ambiguous, deceptive, and contradictory terms and
definitions. The fact the court request that one sign a contract agreeing to be
held to the standard of a licensed attorney would appear the court is holding
the private citizen to a much higher standard in order to access and win in
court.
The standard to
prove damages is set much higher in proportion with the standards to issue a
citation, or summons.
The defendant’s, in
their combined motion to dismiss, states: “Officer Wech, issues citation #A023469
to plaintiff, noting his “Certification” that he has “Reasonable Grounds” to
believe, and does believe that the plaintiff violated three sections of the
city ordinances. Defendant’s fail to state what those reasonable grounds
were, and plaintiff is incorrect in his statement. Officer Wech, only
issues a citation for one violation. Officer Robinson, issued a citation with
several violations.
This case is simple;
officer’s stopped Neighbors, on 3 different occasions based on “Reasonable
Grounds” that he was violating something that is not a real law. It would appear
the bar for remedy is set much higher that the bar for officers’ conduct “under
color of law.”
The exhibits
attached to the claim are going to be used to show a pattern of “Abuse” to the
jury. Neighbors, is only claiming damage for the unlawful traffic stops.
Neighbors, Prays
this court will rule in his favor and provide him “Remedy” for the damages that
he has suffered.
