Mrs. Kathleen Watson has filed for an order of protection without placing any evidence on the record to support her court demand. The order of protection was granted without the court having the "pre-determination" hearing where Kathleen Watson should have been forced to show cause by placing evidence on the record using the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard. This order of protection is filed against a person working in law enforcement and a military vet. It is a sad day when one's "procedural due process' is violated in such harmful way manner in the interest preserving the courts time. The affidavit Kathleen Watson is using in her order for protection is defective due to the fact her client is mentally ill and taking medication. Under contract law, anyone who is mentally ill cannot sign a contract or other legal papers, therefore, the affidavit filed in court requesting the order of protection is defective on its face and will not qualify to give the court proper jurisdiction in this manner. The respondent is facing losing his job in law enforcement due to the false allegation. The respondent has filed several documents in the case. One of his document is a motion for “Sanctions” under rule 11which states in part attorney should not file civil actions without doing a reasonable “pre-filing investigation” or they will be in violation and could face sanctions from the court. When one considers there is no evidence on the record to support the petitioner’s claim that she was punched in the face 4 times in the same incident it becomes clear the attorney failed to do a reasonable pre-filing investigation whereby sanctions should be granted. The fact the petitioner is suffering from a mental illness she cannot be held liable for respondent’s injuries at this time however the attorney the women’s shelter advocate and the court will be held liable because they failed to respect the respondent’s procedural due process rights. Kathleen Watson will also need to respond to the respondent’s motion to strike the petitioner’s verified written petition due to the fact the petitioner is suffering from the delusional disorder and her affidavit is filled with delusional imaginary falsehoods.
It appears Mrs. Kathleen Watson is discriminating against the respondent based on the fact the respondent is Black. The respondent is now bringing his claim of 3.5 million for discrimination and violation of his procedural due process rights. This claim will be filed in Federal Court and the defendants will be Kathleen Watson, Kansas Legal Aid, the women’s shelter and the court. The respondents claim will be filed under the Tuckers Act 2.4.c. for violation of respondent’s procedural due process rights.
