Guy Neighbors Federal Civil Rights Lawsuit Against The Lawrence Kansas Police Department, and The City of Lawrence

This is a final draft of our Federal Civil Rights Violation Law Suit.

Guy Neighbors Law Suit Against the Lwerance Kansas Police Department and The City of Lawrence Kansas (Amedd... by Guy Madison Neighbors

. Statement of Entitlement

The defendant’s violated Neighbors, rights guaranteed by the constitution at 18 U.S.C.S. 1983. The defendant’s racially profiled Neighbors, during several traffic stops that were performed without probable cause. The defendant’s acted with “Deliberate Indifference” to following the “Constitution” or “Federal Laws” when they performed the traffic stops on Neighbors, without probable cause. These un-lawful traffic stops were the result of the Un- Constitutional Policies, Procedures, Ordinances, and Laws the City of Lawrence implemented.

The defendant’s acted with deliberate indifference to following the constitution, and federal laws. Neighbors was damaged while the defendants were enforcing city policies while acting “under color of law,” and the unconstitutional policies, procedures, ordinances, City Laws are the source of this action.

 Courts Citation Process is Un-Constitutional:

Separation of powers is a political doctrine  originating in the writings of Montesquieu in The Spirit of the Laws where he urged for a constitutional government with three separate branches of government. Each of the three branches would have defined abilities to check the powers of the other branches. This idea was called separation of powers. This philosophy heavily influenced the writing of the United States Constitution, according to which the Legislative Executive  and Judicial branches of the United States government are kept distinct in order to prevent abuse of power.

When Lawrence Kansas Police officer issued Neighbors, a “Summons” that was NOT signed by a “Judicial officer” of the court,( prior to the ticket being issued), it is a violation of the “Separation of Powers” clause the of the Constitution, and therefore the defendant’s violated Neighbors, Constitutional Rights for each of the 3 citations. Neighbors suffered damages.

Our legal system and statutes are filled with ambiguous, deceptive, and contradictory terms and definitions. The fact the court request that one sign a contract agreeing to be held to the standard of a licensed attorney would appear the court is holding the private citizen to a much higher standard in order to access and win in court.

The standard to prove damages is set much higher in proportion with the standards to issue a citation, or summons.

The defendant’s, in their combined motion to dismiss, states: “Officer Wech, issues citation #A023469 to plaintiff, noting his “Certification” that he has “Reasonable Grounds” to believe, and does believe that the plaintiff violated three sections of the city ordinances. Defendant’s fail to state what those reasonable grounds were, and plaintiff is incorrect in his statement. Officer Wech, only issues a citation for one violation. Officer Robinson, issued a citation with several violations.

This case is simple; officer’s stopped Neighbors, on 3 different occasions based on “Reasonable Grounds” that he was violating something that is not a real law. It would appear the bar for remedy is set much higher that the bar for officers’ conduct “under color of law.”

The exhibits attached to the claim are going to be used to show a pattern of “Abuse” to the jury. Neighbors, is only claiming damage for the unlawful traffic stops.

Neighbors, Prays this court will rule in his favor and provide him “Remedy” for the damages that he has suffered.