Is it a due process violation when a police officer issues a summons that is not prior signed by a judicial officer of the court, the “Separation Clause” provides the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive branches will be separated.  When an officer from the executive branch sign’s and issues a citation it is a violation of the separation clause of the constitution because the summons was Not signed by a “Judicial” officer of the court. Right?

If you think violation like

Please like our new page below:

https://seen.life/21913833guy-neighbors/profile

Marietta Parker & Terra D. Morehead's Vindictive illegal Lis Pendens Against Yellow House Business Owner's Proper

Terra D. Morehead

Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p).10th Circuit rules “substitute assets” are not subject to pre-trial restraint, yet after the Neighbors had their home listed on the Market for nearly 7 months, finally obtain a qualified buyer, the Neighbors are notified on Feb. 21, 2008 through a title search that the prosecutor from the U.S. Department of Justice Marietta Parker has put an illegal lis pendens lien against the Home and Business property at 1904 Mass. owned by the defendants. Destroying the ability of the defendants to proceed with the sale of the home. The illegal lis pendens was placed on the property September of 2007, in anticipation of a cash judgement upon conviction in a vindictive egregeous case. Secretly placed absent of any legal notice through the Wichita office of the U.S. Department of Justice. When the case is from the Kansas City based U.S. Dept. of Justice. ANNALYSIS OF THE SCHEME- Because the prosecutor Assistant United States Attorney Marietta Parker placed the Lis pendens on the property secretly absent of any legal notice and through the Wichita Office. Filed and signed under oath "secretly" under the name of a U.S. Attorney from Wichita not involved in the Yellow House case (Annette B. Gurney) Assistant U.S. Attorney Ks.S. Ct. #11602. (316)269-6481 It would appear the prosecutor has gone to great lengths to keep this order hidden. Could it be this would allow the forfeiture to be "under the table" so to speak, and allow the Prosecutor to "Launder the Money" from the sale of the property for her own personal advancement? click on the link to see the documents: http://picasaweb.google.com/guysmileys/MariettaParkerHasPutAnIllegalLisPendensLisPendensLienAgainstTheYellowHouseProperty A VIOLATION OF RIGHTS -Not only was the Neighbors rights violated by the Lis Pendens order, their rights were further violated when the order interfered with the sale of the home. The rights of the defendants are even further violated when the prosecutor failed to notify the Neighbors with-in 60 days of the allegation of Lis pendens against the property as required by law. PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE.-Why would an experienced prosecutor place an illegal lis pendens order against a property that had been owned by the defendants for nearly 12 years?The 10 cir, ct. has ruled a lis pendens notice is intended to preserve property rights in existence at the time litigation commences, but does not create new or additional property rights. Additionally, under Kansas law, a lis pendens cannot be filed in “anticipation of a money judgment.” Obviously allowing such a filing would interfere with the defendants right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. CONCLUSION-In conclusion the conduct of the Government in this case is outrageous and with total disregard for the laws these officials have taken an oath to uphold. The Government has proceeded with no regard for the defendants constitutional rights and have failed to uphold any level accountability for their own actions. The Government does not hold itself to even the same minimal standards of conduct that they are expecting of the
defendants they are prosecuting. IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE-If that is true then why do excuses keep getting made for the Prosecutors and police officers involved in the Yellow House case? Why is that they are allowed to violate the laws they are supposed to be inforcing and the courts continue to make excuses for them, and cover up for their mistakes as if they are above the same code of conduct they are holding the public to! Labels: Annette B Gurney, Corruption in the Federal Government prosecutors office., Illegal Government Lien against property in criminal case, Illegal prosecution of Yellow House Lawrence Kansas

Lawrence Police Chief Ron Olin & Marietta Parker's Superseding Indictment Is a Vindictive Corruption Cover-Up In The Yellow House Case.

This was one of our old blog postings I' think from 2007
 This latest superseding indictment is an obvious attempt by the prosecutor for more cover-ups. What is most sad is what kind of injustice the witnesses only listed by initials on the Yellow House indictment the Government claims are known to the Grand Jury have had to endure since 2005. How much intimidation and harassment has been forced upon them to bring them to the point we are at now? These people who as the indictment indicates are known to the Grand Jury should in reality be listed as victims of the Government.
These individuals who the Government are using as pawns in this case have been harassed at their work place, intimidated, searched, followed, pulled over without being ticketed, illegally taken into custody to be interrogated about the Yellow House, lied to, had their families thrown to the floor and concussion grenades thrown into their homes by Lawrence Police officers, scared to death then been given plea deals and even released from prison early in exchange for their perjured non credible testimony.
 Several customers victimized during the investigation of this business have filed formal complaints, and one customer is in the litigation process of a huge lawsuit against the city of Lawrence Kansas and its Police department for the harassment that was endured because of this corrupt investigation. The question is where is the evidence of a crime? Where are the police reports? Where is the evidence that the owners of the Yellow House business ever participated in any property crimes, thefts, or fencing schemes when hearsay evidence is not admissible in federal court?Why has not one thief or booster been arrested in connection with the Yellow House business or the investigation that has spanned over nearly three years?How can the Government continue to put lis pendens and Forfeitures against the defendants property when there are no convictions?Because someone scared out their wits that has been harassed and intimidated by the police and Government officials over a period of nearly three years are known to the Grand Jury to have sold something to the business because the Government saw their name on a check the business wrote them, does not constitute a Federal crime or a money laundering scheme.This new superseding indictment, which is now the fourth indictment based upon one original indictment from 2005 with no new incidents of wrong doing is a disgrace to the Justice System. The indictment calls for a forfeiture of property listed as a substitute asset. This is clearly not admissible in the 10th circuit court. There are no fruits of any crime here because there is no crime that has been proven to have been committed; only hearsay evidence has been presented by people with questionable credibility, and there have been no convictions in this case. It makes no sense that the Government would charge defendants with no criminal history of being unlawful users with a firearm, and then dismiss the charges.Then bring back the same charges with added enhancements execute a second arrest without new incidents on the same charges. Then file yet another indictment of money laundering
and mail fraud based on circumstantial evidence, false written statements and perjury. Then 5 months later, file a vindictive superseding indictment on top of the original questionable indictment two days after the defendants file a motion to dismiss an illegal forfeiture allegation on their property.How many times between 2005 and 2008 can a couple of pissed off Federal prosecutors9Terra D Morehead & Marietta N. Parker #77807 charge and arrest the same defendants on the same charges in a corrupt vindictive prosecution? Here is # 5 of Marietta's indictment and it clearly states upon conviction, and any property traceable to such offense, Parker has No conviction and has NOT proved any property has been traced to the crimes she has charged the yellow house business owners , What is wrong with you Parker ! Your supervisor should make you sit down and shut up! You are NOT the Judge or the Jury! Here is the section of the law from her Vindictive Indictment, Note the" words convicted of offense" and "alleged to be traceable to" Sounds like Parker has the Business owners guilty and convicted before the trial ( if there ever is one) For example, 18 U.S.C. § 982 (a)(1) provides, “The court, inimposing sentence on a person convicted of an offense in violation of section 1956 . . .shall order that the person forfeit to the United States any property, real or personal,involved in such offense, or any property traceable to such offense.” In this case, theAndover property is alleged to be traceable to the offense of money laundering. Is this case really being prosecuted by impartial prosecutors? If you would like to help the Yellow business Owners please call Parkers Office and ask why these charges have not been dropped, also would you like to know just how many millions of dollars of tax payers money have been wasted on this stupid vindictive prosecution. Marietta Parker, # 77807 marietta.parker@usdoj.gov Assistant United States Attorney Case 2:07-cr-20124-CM Document 43 Filed 03/04/2008 1-913-551-6674 or 1-913-551-6730 or call 1-913-390-5023 or 1-913-551-6732 Or call the Cell phone at 1-913-961-2539 FBI Public Corruption at 1-816-221-6100 Topeka FBI ask for Scott Gentine 1-785-235-3811 or 1-785-368-1555 Maybe you could call the Kansas Human Right Commission about our case at toll free 1-888-793-6874 Please do not forget to contact Dan Winter at the ACLU for us at 1-816-756-3113 or email the aclu at staff@aclukswmo.org Thanks for all of your helping us fight Parkers Corruption. Labels: 10th circuit court lis penden, money laundering mail fraud vexaious prosecution, perjury indictment, vindictive prosecution