Federal Prosecutor Marietta Parker Illegally Obtained a Search Warrant To Delete Guy Neighbors Blogspot Post About Federal Prosecutor Terra D. Morehead's Possible Drug History.

This is a very old blog posting from my 1st blog site set up about our case. This blog posting is about the federal prosecutor's possible drug history. The government was pretty grumpy about the posting about the federal prosecutors possible drug history.

 Federal prosecutor's Parker, and Morehead, filed a motion to have  Neighbors, bond revoked because if this blog posting below. Morehead, broke down and started crying in the court room, as the judge denied their request for detention for blogging. Things became very personal and the corruption to beat me and Carrie, down intensified.

The Old Blog Posting:



Guy N

show details 2/23/09

Prosecutor Marietta Parker Deletes Blogspot post about Federal prosecutor Terra Morehead's Possible Drug History in a Cover-Up Conspiracy In The Yellow House Investigation.

Prosecutor Marietta Parker used password obtained through warrant to edit and deletes posts from defendant Guy Neighbors blog site!
Here is a slide show of the blog post that was deleted, click on the document and it will open up for easy viewing. To
understand why and what has happened here in the present we must first go back to the past.During an evidence hearing November 5, 2007 before the Honorable Judge Lungstrum; U.S. Attorney Terra Morehead explains to the Judge that the reason the defendants Guy and Carrie Neighbors were denied their legal right to a speedy trial was because there was a tornado in Greensburg Kansas.....Later while talking to some long time friends the Neighbors mentioned they did not understand why the tornado in Greensburg Kansas would be the reason the Prosecutor told the Judge they were denied the speedy trial. The Neighbors were informed by this friend that Terra was from Greensburg and that they had gone to school with Terra Morehead. They also knew Terra's family and informed the Neighbors that they believed Terra and her brother had a possible history of drug abuse and that from what they knew the family had been torn apart by drugs. They questioned how someone with a drug history had become a Federal Prosecutor. Mr. Neighbors then posted a story with this acquired information asked as a question on his blog site. He felt the information could be connected to the discriminatory abusive treatment he and his wife had received, while being prosecuted in
Federal court by Terra Morehead. He also believed this history of drug abuse in Ms. Moreheads family combined by her hatred towards people of color could be what is driving the prosecutor to abuse his civil rights and show obvious signs that she and her partner U.S Assistant Attorney
Marietta Parker are taking the case personal.
This posting greatly upset the Prosecutors. In response to the posting, Prosecuting Attorney Terra Morehead immediately motioned to have the defendants Gagged. During the hearing the Prosecutor Terra Morehead had an emotional breakdown, she cried and pleaded with Judge to gag the
defendants, and make them stop blogging. She stated that a photo taken
from the "Scruffy the dog case internet story" had been placed on the
defendants blog site, and that she had received threats because this
photo which was already publicly displayed on the internet had been posted on the blog site. She told the Judge that because of the blogs her cases were being investigated 5 years back by an outside agency! The day of the hearing for the gag order, Mr. Neighbors is informed through
an anonomous email through the blog account, that a co-worker of
Marietta Parker overheard her in her office preparing for the hearing; slamming things and yelling the 'N' word! Mr. Neighbors again angered
the prosecutor by posting this aquired information on his blog site.
Sometime around May 2008 Prosecuting U.S. Federal Attorney Marietta Parker served a warrant on Sunflower cable to obtain the password information connected to the defendants Internet activities ( we are not sure the warrant was legal and signed by a federal judge). She then logs into the defendants blog account and proceeds to go to the edit tools
to delete the story Mr. Neighbors had written about Terra Moreheads
possible past drug history. There is also evidence through her actions that she was also logging into the email accounts and possibly reading attorney client correspondence emails. To cover up for the fact she has illegally edited Mr. Neighbors blog account, Federal Prosecutor Marietta Parker then files a motion to revoke the bonds of the defendants Mr. Neighbors and his wife based on the blogs. To support her motion to revoke the bond she uses pages from the blogs as exhibits. These exhibits clearly show when she copied and printed them off, she was not only logged into Mr. Neighbors blog account, she had also used the editing tools before printing off the pages. (The editing tools can still be seen in the exhibits. See photo
at top of page) What possible probable cause would give a Federal
Prosecuting attorney the right to serve a search warrant on a defendants Internet provider in order to obtain passwords to everything in relation to that defendants Internet IP address? Thus allowing this prosecutor to tamper with 'the evidence' which is in this case constitutionally protected freedom of speech postings on a private blog site and view private emails that contain attorney client correspondence? How many constitutionally protected rights can a defendant have violated while being corruptly prosecuted? What justifiable legal basis or probable cause could a prosecutor possibly have; to get a warrant for passwords that enables her to be editing and eavesdropping on a defendants emails and blogging pages in relation to trumped up Federal charges based the execution of an illegal warrantless search of the defendants home and a bogus stolen property, money laundering case that hinges on the perjured testimony of convicted felons?The actions of these prosecutors clearly show cover-up, conspiracy, tampering with the evidence, obstruction of justice, misuse of private information obtained through a search warrant, violation of privacy and a violation of Attorney rules of ethics.
Labels: calculated cover-up conspiracy by Federal Justice Department, Marietta Parker uses search warrant to alter evidence, obstruction of justice

Lawrence Kansas Police Officer Violates The wrong Black Man's Rights

This police dash cam shows an officer performing a traffic on Guy Neighbors. The officer lied in court and testified he could see that Neighbors did not have his seat belt on. Neighbors, is fighting the case and had a 350-k 1983 civil action filed in the matter. Neighbors, also files several restraining orders / injunction, to block Municipal from continuing to make judicial determinations without judicial authority. Neighbors contends Kansas Municipal Court gets its authority from the Lawrence City ordinance, not the "Constitution". Neighbors . states he is not subject to following the city ordinance unless he chooses to .
Look at the video can you see who is driving the truck or if the driver has on his seat belt on.

                                     https://www.facebook.com/guy.neighbors

New Legal Document Research Business Opens Up On Amazom

Advocate's For Justice Legal Research Business

A new legal document research business,"Advocates for Justice" Legal Research, opened on Amazon and is enjoying very a very warm welcome by both Amazon and Amazon shoppers. This legal research document site has documents prepared already that can help you win in court. Advocate's for Justice has documents that will defend against Foreclosures, 3rd party debt collectors, traffic court citations, criminal charges.  and much more. The legal documents are very affordable for everyone, and they are prepared with a different strategy than what attorneys use. The legal research documents at advocates for justice will address policies and procedures the government and corporate businesses ignore when they are harassing you. It will definitely be worth your time to take a look at the site and see what they have to offer.

www.amazon.com/shops/winincourtnow

Thank You

Owner: Guy Neighbors
            14311 W. Megan St.
            Chandler, AZ 85224
`           1-813-575-0319
             winincourts1@gmail.com

Guy Neighbors, Restraining Order to Block Lawrence Kansas Municipal Court From Making Judicial Ruling without "Jurisdiction"

Guy Neighbors, Restraining Order/ Injunction to Block Kansas Municipal Court From Making Judicial Rulings W... by Guy Madison Neighbors

Guy Neighbors, moves the court to Issue an Injunction and Restraining Order pursuant to Rule 65. (a) (b) (A) to block Judge Scott Miller, and City of Lawrence Municipal Court from Continuing to violate the Constitutional Rights of Neighbors, and other citizens of Lawrence Kansas and states:
I. The issue here is The Lawrence Kansas Municipal Court is a non- constitutional court who is claiming to have judicial authority from Article III of the Unites States Constitution. Article 4 provides authority for an article IV court to have administrative authority to make rules and administration functions. The problem is since this court is Not a part of the Constitution this court has no authority to take power from the “Constitution”or perform judicial function. This court gets its authority from the City “ordinance” Not the Constitution or Congress. Municipal Court is making judicial determinations without “Jurisdiction”. This unlawful practice is in violation of the Constitution and affects all citizens of Lawrence Kansas.
Neighbors, moves this court to issue a restraining order and injunction to block the court from continuing this unlawful practices.

Guy Neighbors Files Restraining Order/ Injunction To Block Judge Scott Miller, From Retaliating Against Him!

                                                                                 

https://www.scribd.com/doc/292015288/Motion-for-Injunction-and-Restraining-to-Block-Judge-Scott-Miller-From-Revoking-Neighbors-Drivers-Licenses

This was a little surprise bomb shell that was delivered to federal court today. The traffic court judge was very grumpy, that I figured out how to move my case right out of his fraudulent court room!!!

Today I' filed the documents and 3 hrs. later 'received a call from the Judged Deputy, she said the Judge wanted to know if I’ wanted him to have a hearing on my restraining order and injunction, blocking the traffic court’s retaliation against me by revoking my driver’s licenses. The Deputy wanted to know if I’ wanted to schedule a hearing, or if I wanted the judge to rule from the paper. I chose to allow him to rule from the paper because I’ can see the court in Topeka, is operating differently in a very good way. Things are getting interesting up in here.

Judge Scott Miller has a conflict of interest, due to the civil action Neighbors filed against Miller.

Guy Neighbors Federal Civil Rights Lawsuit Against The Lawrence Kansas Police Department, and The City of Lawrence

This is a final draft of our Federal Civil Rights Violation Law Suit.

Guy Neighbors Law Suit Against the Lwerance Kansas Police Department and The City of Lawrence Kansas (Amedd... by Guy Madison Neighbors

. Statement of Entitlement

The defendant’s violated Neighbors, rights guaranteed by the constitution at 18 U.S.C.S. 1983. The defendant’s racially profiled Neighbors, during several traffic stops that were performed without probable cause. The defendant’s acted with “Deliberate Indifference” to following the “Constitution” or “Federal Laws” when they performed the traffic stops on Neighbors, without probable cause. These un-lawful traffic stops were the result of the Un- Constitutional Policies, Procedures, Ordinances, and Laws the City of Lawrence implemented.

The defendant’s acted with deliberate indifference to following the constitution, and federal laws. Neighbors was damaged while the defendants were enforcing city policies while acting “under color of law,” and the unconstitutional policies, procedures, ordinances, City Laws are the source of this action.

 Courts Citation Process is Un-Constitutional:

Separation of powers is a political doctrine  originating in the writings of Montesquieu in The Spirit of the Laws where he urged for a constitutional government with three separate branches of government. Each of the three branches would have defined abilities to check the powers of the other branches. This idea was called separation of powers. This philosophy heavily influenced the writing of the United States Constitution, according to which the Legislative Executive  and Judicial branches of the United States government are kept distinct in order to prevent abuse of power.

When Lawrence Kansas Police officer issued Neighbors, a “Summons” that was NOT signed by a “Judicial officer” of the court,( prior to the ticket being issued), it is a violation of the “Separation of Powers” clause the of the Constitution, and therefore the defendant’s violated Neighbors, Constitutional Rights for each of the 3 citations. Neighbors suffered damages.

Our legal system and statutes are filled with ambiguous, deceptive, and contradictory terms and definitions. The fact the court request that one sign a contract agreeing to be held to the standard of a licensed attorney would appear the court is holding the private citizen to a much higher standard in order to access and win in court.

The standard to prove damages is set much higher in proportion with the standards to issue a citation, or summons.

The defendant’s, in their combined motion to dismiss, states: “Officer Wech, issues citation #A023469 to plaintiff, noting his “Certification” that he has “Reasonable Grounds” to believe, and does believe that the plaintiff violated three sections of the city ordinances. Defendant’s fail to state what those reasonable grounds were, and plaintiff is incorrect in his statement. Officer Wech, only issues a citation for one violation. Officer Robinson, issued a citation with several violations.

This case is simple; officer’s stopped Neighbors, on 3 different occasions based on “Reasonable Grounds” that he was violating something that is not a real law. It would appear the bar for remedy is set much higher that the bar for officers’ conduct “under color of law.”

The exhibits attached to the claim are going to be used to show a pattern of “Abuse” to the jury. Neighbors, is only claiming damage for the unlawful traffic stops.

Neighbors, Prays this court will rule in his favor and provide him “Remedy” for the damages that he has suffered.

Press Release Going Out To Bring Notice To Neighbors 1983 Civil Action Against The Lawrence Police and the City of Lawrence Kansas

                       Guy Neighbors Press Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Kansas Resident Slams Lawrence Police Department With

Federal Civil Rights Violation Lawsuit

After enduring countless violations of his Civil Rights, Guy Neighbors

had enough of illegal police procedures that violated his rights to

Due Process. The “Good-Old-Boys” mentality is thriving in Lawrence, Kansas.

Lawrence, Kansas, November 30, 2015, In a civil rights case that warrants everyone’s attention, Guy Neighbors has placed the spotlight squarely on the Lawrence Kansas Police Department along with the City of Lawrence. Guy filed an action under U.S.C.42/Sec.1983 in the United States District  Court in Kansas. Case #15-4921 throws down the gauntlet against what appears to be an organized attempt to deprive Mr. Neighbors of his basic constitutional rights. The case clearly states how police officers exceeded their authority to act without probable cause. The only time officers may act without a certain probable cause is in the case of “exigent circumstances”, which did not exist with this purported seat belt violation.

After reviewing the facts of the case, one might wonder how a police officer in a patrol car could see whether Mr. Neighbors was wearing a seat belt while he was in a Truck. Neighbors stated the police car dash cam video showed that the officer could not see who was driving the vehicle or if the driver had his seat belt. It is obvious that they could not. The Officers used this “supposed” seat belt violation as an open door to harass Guy Neighbors beyond belief. The fact that they knew Mr. Neighbors, who is an Afro-American, was married to a Caucasian women was the basis for the showing of “racial animus” as the cause for repeated unlawful stops. The question arises as to how many other Lawrence Kansas citizens have been the subjects of these targeted civil rights violations.

The improprieties extend beyond the local police department, and include the Lawrence Municipal Court where hearings on legal cases are heard without any record keeping. The Municipal Court has only Administrative Authority, it does not have Jurisdiction, and it is not a Court of Record. No stenographers were present to document what has transpired between the Defendant and the City. This is in-and-of-itself a Violation of the right of Due Process. How can a person proceed to a higher court with no transcript of proceedings? This is a procedure from the middle ages, and needs to be corrected right now. How can a Defendant show prosecutorial misconduct in court without a transcript, or maybe they are afraid to show how cozy the Judges are with the Prosecutors. This is the “Good-Old-Boys” mentality where there is an unwritten code of cooperation which inherently tramples on Civil Rights.

In Neighbors case, he alleges: “The Defendants violated Neighbors rights guaranteed by the constitution at 18 U.S.C./Sec.1983. The Defendants racially profiled Neighbors during several traffic stops that were performed without probable cause. The defendants acted with “Deliberate Indifference” to following the “Constitution” or “Federal Laws” when they performed the traffic stops on Neighbors without probable cause. These unlawful traffic stops were the result of the Un- Constitutional Policies, Procedures, Ordinances, and Laws the City of Lawrence implemented.

Neighbors was damaged while the Defendants were enforcing city policies while acting “under color of law,” and the unconstitutional policies, procedures, ordinances, City Laws are the source of this action. Neighbors was damaged and is praying this court grant him just compensation for his injuries, or what the court finds just and fair.” Neighbors will prove that the City of Lawrence Traffic/Municipal Court citation process and procedures are un-constitutional. Neighbors challenged the Municipal Court’s jurisdiction and that challenge was never stated on the record in the case. The citations issued in this cause of action were flawed. Kansas State law requires a description of the alleged violation on the face of the citation. The citation filed in court in this case did not have a description written on the face of the citation.

Guy Neighbors has established a Blog Site so that the public can follow this precedent setting case.

For complete information, please visit: http://guyneig.blogspot.com/

Media Contact:

Guy Neighbors

Attn: Media relations

Lawrence, Kansas

PHONE 913-240-0227

EMAIL – guysmileys52@gmail.com