Advocated for Justice Paralegal Services+ has a new link to leave google reviews please click on the link and leave us a review and tell others about our new service.
http://search.google.com/local/writereview?placeid=ChIJ9-gMAFEHK4cRUeMrSgxHOwQ
This Blog supports Advocates for Justice Paralegal Services we will be blogging about how we can draft and help you file your documents in court today without the interference of a B.A.R. attorney. We teach you how to defend against 3rd party debt collectors and much more.
Monday, January 9, 2017
Sunday, January 1, 2017
This Blog supports Advocates for Justice Paralegal Services we will be blogging about how we can help you win in court today without the interference of a B.A.R. attorney. We draft affordable documents you need, you file them in your case on your own behalf and save a ton of money.
Our Mission is to provide customers with powerful documents at an affordable price. You can file these documents in court or mail them to debt collectors on your own behalf to achieve your desired outcome. We are here to help the little people who can’t afford high- priced attorneys.
This Works in 3- Steps:
1. The document you need will be emailed to you in a word format or pdf after confirmation of payment.
2. You will need to replace the red font in the document with your information, the collector's mailing address, and account number.
3. Print and mail or file your document.
Advocates for Justice Paralegal Services can help clients get old medical bills removed from their credit report and much more. This can help your credit score increase very quickly which means now you can qualify for that lower financing rate on that new house or vehicle. We have several great reviews on the on our Amazon Store page.
Please call me if you have any questions about how we can help you in your situation the phone calls are free of charge.
913-240-0227
Our Documents Can Assist in Achieving The Following Goals:
- Remove Old Medical Debts From Your Credit Report.
- Attack Old Credit Card Collections.
- Provide Affirmative Answers and Defenses To The Debt Collector's Lawsuits.
- Defend Against Foreclosure Proceedings.
- Defense in Traffic Court.
- Defend Against Civil Action.
- Defend Against Wage Garnishment
- Defend Against Civil Action.
- Address a Hostile Work Environment.
- Landlord Tenant Disputes Actions.
Customers Who Use Our Documents will Receive The Following Benefits:
a. Credit Score Increased In a Very Short Amount of Time.
b. Keep More Of Their Hard Earned Money in Their Pockets.
c. Qualify for Better Financing.
d. No More Harassing Phone Calls.
e. We Do Not Handle Any of Our Client’s Personal Information.
f. The Knowledge to Defend Your Self In The Future.
g. The Satisfaction of Winning
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
Asha Spaulding's Unlawful Civil Asset Forfeiture was Filed Against Her Bank Account And Her Money Was Seized Without Due Process
Nobody is willing to step up and accept responsibility for the
unlawful seizure of Asha Spaulding’s bank account from the Geo Vista Credit
Union. It would appear the conspirators who participated in the embezzlement of
Spaulding’s bank account have decided to bury their heads in the sand, in hopes
that Spaulding, will give up her quest for justice and accept their injuries
caused by the theft of her bank account.
The attorney for the city of Statesboro Georgia, responded to
Asha Spaulding's, request for a copy of the "Return of Service" to
verify that she was served, and he was confused as to if those requested
records should be exempt from a freedom of information act request. His
response was silly, the requested documentation should be filed in Spaulding's
civil asset forfeiture case already, and it should be a matter of public
record.
The letter from the Statesboro’s attorney did not have a copy of
the return of service in it because Spaulding was not served. The staff here at
Advocates for Justice, have been investigating this case for quite some time
now and we searched both data bases the State of Georgia, uses to store the
notice of publication, and we were unable to come up with any evidence to
support that the State of Georgia actually publicized any forfeiture notice as
pertains to Spaulding’s Assets that were illegally seized.
The 2nd document that was mailed to Spaulding from the
Statesboro city hall appears to be the Police officer's investigation report,
which was not filed in the state case, and the top right hand corner of the
page it will show the page numbers are not in sequence. It would appear the
pages were randomly selected printed off and mailed to Spaulding, to quince her
thirst and get her to sit quietly and forget about the money that was
unlawfully taken from her bank account. See Spaulding's, Georgia State Civil
Forfeiture file: Spauldings pdf Citys response file 4-18-16
It would appear the government was planning to avoid
transparency and reporting the income to the IRS, by not following the new
Georgia Asset Forfeiture laws, and the laws that require the process of service
before property can be seized. Due process is violated when the court allows
the forfeiture of property without proof of service.
Word is officers of the court in Statesboro, have made
derogatory comments about Black American’s, alleged lower level of
“sophistication,” could this racist attitude be the driving factor behind
in injustice Spaulding, has suffered because the State of Georgia, unlawfully
seized her bank account without due process.
The court has ignored the documents that Spaulding, has filed on
the record and has failed to call for an investigation. Spaulding, is filing
her motion for emergency hearing on her restraining order, and she is filing a
motion to Disqualify Judge John Turner, from her civil action, he is unfit to
rule in this case, because Judge Turner, was the decision maker in the Asset
Forfeiture case that violated Spaulding's right to due process.Spaulding, listed the names of everyone who signed documents in
the unlawful State Forfeiture case. The conspiracy statutes will connect the
liable parties together and everyone will share in the liability.
Spaulding, is in the process of filing a formal complaint
requesting an investigation into embezzlement of her money, and she will also
be filing her "Notice of Claim" against everyone listed in the
document to disqualify the judge.
Spaulding, is also demanding the case be moved to the Chief
Justice’s Court room in a different town because of the conspiracy and high
level of corruption in Statesboro Georgia.
I'm posting it for the same reason we posted stuff in the
1st place, to put pressure on them to act!
babe, you don't get it!!!
If the judge's butt will catch on fire they will settle!
think about it.. they bust their asses to protect the judge! its their JOB,
Number 1 job is to protect the Judge and the court! If you stomp on everything
they will not want to go there! They will want to settle.
Carrie, I can’t go back to the old way of thinking and that
way did not help you in your case for 8yrs, Carrie, if i put enough pressure on
the judge and be a huge pain in his ass we will have a higher chance to get
them to throw in the towel!
Remember we don't have a chance in hell of winning in a
trial!!! So why would I need to worry about the judge. Dude the freaking Judge
is NOT on my side, he is on their side., and he already hates me cause I’m
black, lol.
The reason to post this is most of those people had nothing
to do with the theft of her account and they will raise hell when they find out
they have been added to the pot of liability!!!! Don’t you see. The problem is
some of those people that were recently added to the list, you cannot get me to
believe all of those people knew nothing about the fraud going on down there!
Thursday, April 7, 2016
![]() |
| Don't Let This Be You In Debt Collection Court Use Our Documents And Win Today |
My wife and I started a legal document preparation business that will provide a much needed, and valuable service for many people who are struggling to make ends meet. Advocates for Justice documents can help your clients by getting old medical bills and old credit card bills that have been charged off removed from their credit report. This will allow their credit score to increase very quickly and help them to qualify for better financing, and in some case could be the difference between a sale or the client heading to the “buy here pay here” lot.
We teach our clients how do this by using a
document to addresses the issue of the corporate charge off. A charge off
occurs when the corporate business claims these alleged unpaid debts on their
taxes, and writes the unpaid balances off on their company’s insurance as a
loss.
When the
original business sells the alleged debt after a charge off to a debt collector
it is violation, and the original company can be held liable in civil court for
the unlawful collection of an alleged debt, and other criminal charges.
Advocates for
Justice, teaches clients how to uses a HIPAA, violation document to remove old
medical debts from client’s credit report, and it works great because their
medical billing information is protected under HIPAA, the federal Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.
The Privacy
Rule, is a Federal law, that gives consumers rights over their health care
information and sets rules and limits on who can look at and receive consumer’s
health information.
The Privacy
Rule applies to all forms of individuals' protected health information, whether
electronic, written, or oral. The Security Rule is a Federal law that requires
security for health information in electronic form.
Corporate
companies get away with these fraudulent practices because consumers are not
aware, the laws that protect them are found in the “Acts” that Congress passes.
Just think
how many families are affected by this fraudulent practice, many family’s would
have qualified for better financing for that new car, or house had their credit
not been attacked by these unlawful debt collectors.
Now the
consumer has options, we are confident that you will be very satisfied with the
quality of service we offer and our commitment to customer satisfaction.
Our documents
will help clients in the following areas:
1. Removing
Old Medical Debts from your credit report.
2. Attacking
old credit card collections.
3. Providing
answers to the debt collector’s lawsuits.
4.
Interrupting foreclosure proceedings.
5. Wining in
traffic court.
6.
Foreclosure Defense.
1. They will
have their credit score increased in a very short amount of time.
2. They will
be able to keep more their hard earned money in their pockets.
3. They will
qualify for better financing.
4. No more
harassing phone calls.
5. We do not
handle any of the client’s personal information.
We have both a business web site and an
Amazon store at: www.amazon.com/shops/winincourtnow
Below is information you would need to find our document on Amazon
Web: address winincourtnow.com
ASIN: B01BB8QZUS
Product Name: HIPAA Violation Letter
Manufacturer: Advocate's For Justice
Brand Name: Advocate's Legal Documents
Manufacturer Part Number: B-1
Product Name: HIPAA Violation Letter
Manufacturer: Advocate's For Justice
Brand Name: Advocate's Legal Documents
Manufacturer Part Number: B-1
Product ID: 040232390821
Product ID Type: upc
Category (item-type): legal-forms
Product ID Type: upc
Category (item-type): legal-forms
Amazon Sales Rank: 490,984
Thank you for
considering Advocates for Justice.
Sincerely:
______________________________ 4/7/2016
Saturday, March 26, 2016
Is it a due process violation when a police officer issues a
summons that is not prior signed by a judicial officer of the court, the “Separation
Clause” provides the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive branches will be
separated. When an officer from the
executive branch sign’s and issues a citation it is a violation of the separation
clause of the constitution because the summons was Not signed by a “Judicial”
officer of the court. Right?
If you think violation like
Please like our new page below:
https://seen.life/21913833guy-neighbors/profile
Tuesday, March 1, 2016
Marietta Parker & Terra D. Morehead's Vindictive illegal Lis Pendens Against Yellow House Business Owner's Proper
![]() |
| Terra D. Morehead |
defendants they are prosecuting. IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE-If that is true then why do excuses keep getting made for the Prosecutors and police officers involved in the Yellow House case? Why is that they are allowed to violate the laws they are supposed to be inforcing and the courts continue to make excuses for them, and cover up for their mistakes as if they are above the same code of conduct they are holding the public to! Labels: Annette B Gurney, Corruption in the Federal Government prosecutors office., Illegal Government Lien against property in criminal case, Illegal prosecution of Yellow House Lawrence Kansas
Lawrence Police Chief Ron Olin & Marietta Parker's Superseding Indictment Is a Vindictive Corruption Cover-Up In The Yellow House Case.
This latest superseding indictment is an obvious attempt by the prosecutor for more cover-ups. What is most sad is what kind of injustice the witnesses only listed by initials on the Yellow House indictment the Government claims are known to the Grand Jury have had to endure since 2005. How much intimidation and harassment has been forced upon them to bring them to the point we are at now? These people who as the indictment indicates are known to the Grand Jury should in reality be listed as victims of the Government.
These individuals who the Government are using as pawns in this case have been harassed at their work place, intimidated, searched, followed, pulled over without being ticketed, illegally taken into custody to be interrogated about the Yellow House, lied to, had their families thrown to the floor and concussion grenades thrown into their homes by Lawrence Police officers, scared to death then been given plea deals and even released from prison early in exchange for their perjured non credible testimony.
Several customers victimized during the investigation of this business have filed formal complaints, and one customer is in the litigation process of a huge lawsuit against the city of Lawrence Kansas and its Police department for the harassment that was endured because of this corrupt investigation. The question is where is the evidence of a crime? Where are the police reports? Where is the evidence that the owners of the Yellow House business ever participated in any property crimes, thefts, or fencing schemes when hearsay evidence is not admissible in federal court?Why has not one thief or booster been arrested in connection with the Yellow House business or the investigation that has spanned over nearly three years?How can the Government continue to put lis pendens and Forfeitures against the defendants property when there are no convictions?Because someone scared out their wits that has been harassed and intimidated by the police and Government officials over a period of nearly three years are known to the Grand Jury to have sold something to the business because the Government saw their name on a check the business wrote them, does not constitute a Federal crime or a money laundering scheme.This new superseding indictment, which is now the fourth indictment based upon one original indictment from 2005 with no new incidents of wrong doing is a disgrace to the Justice System. The indictment calls for a forfeiture of property listed as a substitute asset. This is clearly not admissible in the 10th circuit court. There are no fruits of any crime here because there is no crime that has been proven to have been committed; only hearsay evidence has been presented by people with questionable credibility, and there have been no convictions in this case. It makes no sense that the Government would charge defendants with no criminal history of being unlawful users with a firearm, and then dismiss the charges.Then bring back the same charges with added enhancements execute a second arrest without new incidents on the same charges. Then file yet another indictment of money laundering
and mail fraud based on circumstantial evidence, false written statements and perjury. Then 5 months later, file a vindictive superseding indictment on top of the original questionable indictment two days after the defendants file a motion to dismiss an illegal forfeiture allegation on their property.How many times between 2005 and 2008 can a couple of pissed off Federal prosecutors9Terra D Morehead & Marietta N. Parker #77807 charge and arrest the same defendants on the same charges in a corrupt vindictive prosecution? Here is # 5 of Marietta's indictment and it clearly states upon conviction, and any property traceable to such offense, Parker has No conviction and has NOT proved any property has been traced to the crimes she has charged the yellow house business owners , What is wrong with you Parker ! Your supervisor should make you sit down and shut up! You are NOT the Judge or the Jury! Here is the section of the law from her Vindictive Indictment, Note the" words convicted of offense" and "alleged to be traceable to" Sounds like Parker has the Business owners guilty and convicted before the trial ( if there ever is one) For example, 18 U.S.C. § 982 (a)(1) provides, “The court, inimposing sentence on a person convicted of an offense in violation of section 1956 . . .shall order that the person forfeit to the United States any property, real or personal,involved in such offense, or any property traceable to such offense.” In this case, theAndover property is alleged to be traceable to the offense of money laundering. Is this case really being prosecuted by impartial prosecutors? If you would like to help the Yellow business Owners please call Parkers Office and ask why these charges have not been dropped, also would you like to know just how many millions of dollars of tax payers money have been wasted on this stupid vindictive prosecution. Marietta Parker, # 77807 marietta.parker@usdoj.gov Assistant United States Attorney Case 2:07-cr-20124-CM Document 43 Filed 03/04/2008 1-913-551-6674 or 1-913-551-6730 or call 1-913-390-5023 or 1-913-551-6732 Or call the Cell phone at 1-913-961-2539 FBI Public Corruption at 1-816-221-6100 Topeka FBI ask for Scott Gentine 1-785-235-3811 or 1-785-368-1555 Maybe you could call the Kansas Human Right Commission about our case at toll free 1-888-793-6874 Please do not forget to contact Dan Winter at the ACLU for us at 1-816-756-3113 or email the aclu at staff@aclukswmo.org Thanks for all of your helping us fight Parkers Corruption. Labels: 10th circuit court lis penden, money laundering mail fraud vexaious prosecution, perjury indictment, vindictive prosecution
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






